Jelena Rodek1, Mate Brekalo1, Stanislav Dragutinović1
1University of Split, Faculty of Kinesiology, Split, Croatia, 2University of Mostar, Faculty of Science and Education, Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Analysis of Sociodemographic–and Sport-Factors as Correlates of Doping Tendency in Professional Handball Players
Sport Mont 2024, 22(2), 117-123 | DOI: 10.26773/smj.240716
Abstract
Factors associated with doping in sports are frequently studied, but sport specific, gender-stratified investigations are rare. This study aimed to evaluate sociodemographic and sport factors associated with doping tendency (DT) in professional handball players. The participants were handball professionals from Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina (n=173; 22.12±3.11 years of age, 64 females and 109 males) who were tested on sociodemographic variables (gender, age, education), sport factors (experience in sport, achievement at the junior and senior level), and doping factors (personal opinion on the problem of doping, doping knowledge, and personal DT). Logistic regressions with sociodemographic- and sport-factors as predictors were calculated for binarized outcome (positive DT vs. negative DT). A greater likelihood of having a positive DT was found for males than for females (OR=1.60, 95% CI: 1.16-2.12) and for those who achieved success at the junior level (OR=1.21, 95% CI: 1.02- 1.95). Among females, positive DT increased with experience in handball (OR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.11-1.55). Male players who achieved better competitive/sport results at a younger age were more prone to doping (OR=1.50, 95% CI: 1.21-1.83). While a greater tendency toward doping in males might be expected due to sociocultural factors, the gender-specific associations indicated specific factors that must be noted in the development of anti-doping strategies in this sport.
Keywords
performance enhancement, predictors, logistic regression, association, athletes
View full article
(PDF – 183KB)
References
Boardley, I. D., Grix, J., & Harkin, J. (2015). Doping in team and individual sports: a qualitative investigation of moral disengagement and associated processes. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 7(5), 698-717. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2014.992039
Bourogiannis, G., Hatzimanouil, D., Semanltianou, E., Georgiadis, I., & Sykaras, E. (2023). Reintegration Program for Professional Football Players after Grade 2 Hamstring Injuries. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.26773/mjssm.230305
Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367.
Deng, Z., Guo, J., Wang, D., Huang, T., & Chen, Z. (2022). Effectiveness of the world anti-doping agency's e-learning programme for anti-doping education on knowledge of, explicit and implicit attitudes towards, and likelihood of doping among Chinese college athletes and non-athletes. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 17(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-022-00459-1
Gilic, B., Ostojic, L., Corluka, M., Volaric, T., & Sekulic, D. (2020). Contextualizing Parental/Familial Influence on Physical Activity in Adolescents before and during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Analysis. Children (Basel), 7(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/children7090125
Gries, K. J., & Trappe, S. W. (2022). The aging athlete: paradigm of healthy aging. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(08), 661-678. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1761-8481
Hatzimanouil, D., Skandalis, V., Terzidis, I., Papasoulis, E., & Mavromatis, G. (2022). Handball players' training profile and its relation to potential injuries. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.26773/mjssm.220910
Houlihan, B., Vidar Hanstad, D., Loland, S., & Waddington, I. (2019). The World Anti-Doping Agency at 20: progress and challenges. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 11(2), 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2019.1617765
Kirby, K., Moran, A., & Guerin, S. (2014). A qualitative analysis of the experiences of elite athletes who have admitted to doping for performance enhancement. In Anti-doping: Policy and Governance (pp. 57-76). Routledge.
Lazuras, L., Barkoukis, V., Rodafinos, A., & Tzorbatzoudis, H. (2010). Predictors of doping intentions in elite-level athletes: a social cognition approach. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32(5), 694-710. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.32.5.694
McLean, S., Naughton, M., Kerherve, H., & Salmon, P. M. (2023). From Anti-doping-I to Anti-doping-II: Toward a paradigm shift for doping prevention in sport. International Journal of Drug Policy, 115, 104019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104019
Mogaji, E., Badejo, F. A., Charles, S., & Millisits, J. (2021). Financial well-being of sportswomen. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 13(2), 299-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2021.1903530
Morente-Sánchez, J., & Zabala, M. (2013). Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes’ attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge. Sports Medicine, 43, 395-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0037-x
Murray, A. (2017). Managing the training load in adolescent athletes. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(s2), S242-S49. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2016-0334
Özkan, Ö., Torğutalp, Ş., Kara, Ö., Dönmez, G., Demirel, A., Karanfil, Y., ... & Korkusuz, F. (2020). Doping knowledge and attitudes of Turkish athletes: a cross-sectional study. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 9(1), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.26773/mjssm.200307
Petróczi, A., & Aidman, E. (2008). Psychological drivers in doping: The life-cycle model of performance enhancement. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 3, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-3-7
Reynolds, K. A., Haycraft, E., & Plateau, C. R. (2022). Sociocultural Influences on Exercise Behaviors and Attitudes in Adolescence. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 19(5), 382-391. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2021-0797
Rodek, J., Idrizovic, K., Zenic, N., Perasovic, B., & Kondric, M. (2013). Differential analysis of the doping behaviour templates in three types of sports. Collegium Antropologicum, 37 Suppl 2, 211-217.
Rodek, J., Sekulic, D., & Pasalic, E. (2009). Can we consider religiousness as a protective factor against doping behavior in sport? Journal of Religion and Health, 48(4), 445-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-008-9207-9
Sajber, D., Maric, D., Rodek, J., Sekulic, D., & Liposek, S. (2019). Toward Prevention of Doping in Youth Sport: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Correlates of Doping Tendency in Swimming. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234851
Sekulic, D., Maric, D., Versic, S., Zevrnja, A., Terzic, A., & Zenic, N. (2021). Familial and Parental Predictors of Physical Activity in Late Adolescence: Prospective Analysis over a Two-Year Period. Healthcare (Basel), 9(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020132
Sekulic, D., Tahiraj, E., Zvan, M., Zenic, N., Uljevic, O., & Lesnik, B. (2016). Doping Attitudes and Covariates of Potential Doping Behaviour in High-Level Team-Sport Athletes; Gender Specific Analysis. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 15(4), 606-615.
Sjöqvist, F., Garle, M., & Rane, A. (2008). Use of doping agents, particularly anabolic steroids, in sports and society. The Lancet, 371(9627), 1872-1882. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60801-6
Varfolomeeva, Z. S., Kozyreva, D. A., & Beresneva, M. L. (2023). Attitudes towards Doping in Adolescent Athletes. Sport Mont, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.26773/smj.230211
Versic, S., Uljevic, O., & Pelivan, K. (2022). Factors Associated with Potential Doping Behaviour in Windsurfing. Sport Mont, 20(1), 89-92. https://doi.org/10.26773/smj.220215
Whitehead, J., Andrée, K. V., & Lee, M. J. (2004). Achievement perspectives and perceived ability: how far do interactions generalize in youth sport? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 5(3), 291-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(03)00016-5
Woodman, T., Barlow, M., Bandura, C., Hill, M., Kupciw, D., & MacGregor, A. (2013). Not all risks are equal: the risk taking inventory for high-risk sports. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 35(5), 479-492. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.35.5.479