Aleksandar Selmanovic1, Mario Jeličić2, Dražan Dizdar3
1University of Dubrovnik, Dubrovnik, Croatia
2University of Split, Faculty of Kinesiology, Split, Croatia
3University of Zagreb, Faculty of Kinesiology, Zagreb, Croatia
Relationship between Offensive Modalities and Results in Elite Basketball Games
Sport Mont 2023, 21(2), 53-58 | DOI: 10.26773/smj.230708
Abstract
Basketball is characterized by a set of alternating offensive and defensive phases generally limited by the change in ball possession, also known as conversion. The aim of this research was to evaluate the difference in offensive types between the winning and losing, noting the variance in game result. A sample composed of 2607 entities representing basketball offense was collected by random selection of 15 Euroleague playoff games. The collected data were processed by the Match Analysis System, and the offense was classified into three basic types: set, transition, and early offense. With nearly equal opponents there is evident a high dynamic balance of transitions, set offenses, as well as other forms of offense, therefore the initial results showed no statistical difference in the distribution and success of offensive forms between opponents in balanced matches. There is significant change evident when focusing on the game periods with the highest point differential. In these periods the winning teams showed above 20% more fast breaks, which is proved to be the most effective type of offense, in addition to significantly better 2-point and 3-point shooting efficiency during set plays. Even though the losing team in balanced matches successfully controlled most of the game, and perhaps even outplayed the opponent, the identified critical intervals (“scoring runs”) proved to be a decisive factor in the final outcome of the game.
Keywords
basketball, offensive structure, Euroleague, scoring run, set offense, transition offense, early offense
View full article
(PDF – 189KB)
References
Bazanov, B., Võhandu, P., & Haljand, R. (2006). Factors influencing the teamwork intensity in basketball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 6(2), 8896.
Csataljay, G., James, N., Hughes M., & Dancs H. (2013). Effects of defensive pressure on basketball shooting performance, International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 13(3), 594-601.
Fewell, J.H., Armbruster, D., Ingraham, J., Petersen, A., & Waters, J. (2012). Basketball Teams as Strategic Networks. PLoS ONE 7(11):e47445. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047445
Gómez, M.A., Pérez, J., Molik, B., Szyman, R.J., & Sampaio, J. (2014). Performance analysis of elite men’s and women’s wheelchair basketball teams. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32(11), 1066-1075
Lupo, C., Condello, G., Capranica, L., & Tessitore, A. (2014). Women’s water polo World Championships: Technical and tactical aspects of winning and losing teams in close and unbalanced games. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(1), 210-222.
Markoski, B., Ivankovic, Z., & Ivkovic M. (2012). Using Neural Networks in Preparing and Analysis of Basketball Scouting. In A. Karahoca (Ed.), Data Mining Applications in Engineering and Medicine. InTech. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/48178
Mikolajec K., Maszczyk A., & Zajac T. (2013). Game indicators determining sports performance in the NBA. Journal of Human Kinetics, 37, 145–151.
Ortega, E., Cardenas, D., Sainz de Baranda, M. P., & Palao, J. M. (2006). Differences between winning and losing teams in basketball games in formation years (14-16 years old). International Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 18(2). 1-11.
Pojskic; H., Separovic, V., & Uzicanin, E. (2009). Differences between successful and unsuccessful basketball teams on the final Olympic tournament. Acta Kinesiologica, 3(2), 110-114.
Refoyo, I., Romaris, I.U., & Sampedro, J. (2009). Analysis of men's and women's basketball fastbreaks. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 18(3), 439-444
Russo, L., Miglietta, G., & Izzo, R.E. (2012). Research on performance indicators from game-related statistics in male basketball European Championship. In I. Jirasek, J. Kosiewicz & D.N. Jr. Roberson (Eds). Sport and Physical Culture in the Mirror of the Social Sciences – Electronic Proceedings Book of The 3rd International Society for the Social Sciences of Sport Conference (pp.64-70) . Olomouc: Palacký University.
Sekulić, D., & Metikoš, D. (2007). Osnove transformacijskih postupaka u kineziologiji (Basics of transformation procedures in kinesiology) . Split: Fakultet prirodoslovno – matematičkih znanosti i kineziologije.
Selmanović, A., Škegro, D., & Milanović, D. (2015). Basic characteristics of offensive modalities in the Euroleague and the NBA. Acta Kinesiologica, 9(2), 83‐87
Škegro, D., Dizdar, D., Milanović, D., & Bradić, A. (2011). Evaluation of basic types of offense in basketball according to its beginning and outcome and the final outcome of the game. In D. Milanović & G. Sporiš (Eds.), Proceedings Book of the 6th International Scientific Conference on Kinesiology, Opatija, 2011 (pp. 565-569) . Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Kinesiology.
Tavares, F., & Gomes N. (2003). The offensive process in basketball – a study in high performance junior teams. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 3(1): 34-39.
Trninić, S., Perica, A., Pavičić, L. (1994). Analiza stanja u košarkaškoj utakmici (Analysis of the situation in a basketball game). Kineziologija, 26(1-2): 27-32.
Trninić, S., Kardum, I., & Mlačić, B. (2010). Hipotetski model specifičnih osobina vrhunskih sportaša u momčadskim sportskim igrama (Hypothetical Model of Specific Characteristics of Elite Athletes in Team Sports Games). Društvena istraživanja, 19, 463-485.
Tsamourtzis, E., Karypidis, A., & Athanasiou, N. (2005). Analysis of fast breaks in basketball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 4(2), 17-22.
Van Wieran, G. (1993). Hope's controlled break and transitional set offence. Scholastic Coach, 63(3), 16 -19.
Witkos, R. (2010). Determining the Success of NCAA Basketball Teams through Team Characteristics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bryant University, USA. Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/honors_mathematics/5